It is not enough to say they are difficult and unique and authentic and challenging and can give purpose to many others -- why are these properties better than the alternatives?
These people carrying instincts for oppression and a lust for revenge, the descendants of all European and non-European slavery, and all pre-Aryan populations in particular, represent the regression of mankind! By dismantling church claims to the theological importance of man, scientists substitute their self-contempt [cynicism] as the ideal of science.
Ressentiment does motivate anti-semites and anarchists. Human history would be a really stupid affair without that spirit which entered it from the powerless.
Anyone who, like my readers, begins to reflect on these points and to think further will have difficulty coming to a quick conclusion—reason enough for me to come to a conclusion myself, provided that it has been crystal clear for a long time what I want, precisely what I want with that dangerous slogan which is written on the body of my last book: Note that Christians, and nearly all if not all theists, tend to implicitly accept what I have called Foundationalism about Purpose.
Nietzsche tries to argue that eternal return is a real possibility, but I think he did not need that -- his point is sufficient as a thought experiment.
People are wrong when they link the traces of a basically dark-haired population, which are noticeable on the carefully prepared ethnographic maps of Germany, with any Celtic origin and mixing of blood, as Virchow does. Most philosophers also fail to qualify for this kind of moral analysis.
Table of Contents Summary On The Genealogy of Morals is made up of three essays, all of which question and critique the value of our moral judgments based on a genealogical method whereby Nietzsche examines the origins and meanings of our different moral concepts. He is the man whom his disciples took away in secret, so that it could be said that he was resurrected or whom the gardener took away, so that the crowd of visitors would not harm his lettuces.
In the word kakos [weak, worthless] as in the word deilos [cowardly] the plebeian in contrast to the agathos [good, excellent] the cowardice is emphasized. Here is an open glimpse into this dark workshop. As evidence of this claim, he offers a disturbing phrase from Saint Thomas: The ascetic priest has a range of strategies for anesthetizing the continuous, low-level pain of the weak.
Contrary to what some have argued, the law and punishment do not arise from ressentiment. In a tribe, the current generation pays homage to its ancestors, offering sacrifices as a demonstration of gratitude. However, you must not make the mistake of thinking that this love arose essentially as the denial of that thirst for vengeance, as the opposite of Jewish hatred.
According to this theory, good is something which has always proved useful, so that it may assert its validity as "valuable in the highest degree" or as "valuable in itself. And the poets will be there, shaking with fear, not in front of the tribunal of Rhadamanthus or Minos, but of the Christ they did not anticipate!
Man relies on the apparatus of forgetfulness [which has been "bred" into him] in order not to become bogged down in the past. Now, in at least one place in The Will to Power, N suggests that choosing his ethic is just a matter of aesthetics -- that he is merely encouraging us to see things his way.
Related to this is having the ability to forget.
Quos praeterea sapientes illos philosophos coram discipulis suis una conflagrantibus erubescentes, quibus nihil ad deum pertinere suadebant, quibus animas aut nullas aut non in pristine corpora redituras affirmabant!
Similarly, the weak adopt the false consciousness that their weakness is a merit.The history of development in philosophical thought was primarily based on Christian traditions and morality formed from religious doctrines.
Nietzsche reveals real sources of philosophical thought that were predetermined by Christian morality for ages. The first essay, "'Good and Evil,' 'Good and Bad'" contrasts what Nietzsche calls "master morality" and "slave morality." Master morality was developed by the strong, healthy, and free, who saw their own happiness as good and named it thus.
Definition Of Good And Evil Essay Words | 4 Pages. Throughout human existence, questions have arisen concerning the nature of good and evil. Many scientist, philosophers, and theologians have been intrigued by these questions.
A summary of First Essay, Sections in Friedrich Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals. Learn exactly what happened in this chapter, scene, or section of Genealogy of Morals and what it means.
Perfect for acing essays, tests, and quizzes, as well as for writing lesson plans. Name Institution Date Friedrich Nietzsche “Beyond Good and Evil” Friedrich Nietzsche was a philosopher from Germany, a poet, a composer, as well as a classical philologist.
On the Genealogy of Morality: A Polemic (German: Zur Genealogie der Moral: Eine Streitschrift) is an book by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. It consists of a preface and three interrelated essays that expand and follow through on concepts Nietzsche sketched out in Beyond Good and Evil .Download