But if the pragmatic argument in favor of legalization were strong enough, it might overwhelm other objections. In fact, the ultimate cause of all criminality is law. There is a strong emphasis on prevention, drug laws have been progressively tightened, and extensive treatment and rehabilitation opportunities are available to users.
Those who do not deal in drugs but commit crimes to fund their consumption of them are, of course, more numerous than large-scale dealers. Within Bolivia, the political rise of current president Evo Morales is directly related to his grassroots movement against US-sponsored coca-eradication and criminalization policies.
The intermediate position on drug legalization, such as that espoused by Ethan Nadelmann, director of the Lindesmith Center, a drug policy research institute sponsored by financier George Soros, is emphatically not the answer to drug-related crime. There should be intelligent treatment of the incurables in outpatient clinics, hospitalization of those not too far gone to respond to therapeutic measures, and application of the prophylactic principles which medicine applies to all scourges of mankind.
Furthermore, current policy has not only failed to provide adequate access to treatment for substance abuse, it has, in many ways, rendered the obtaining of such treatment, and of other medical services, more difficult and even dangerous to pursue.
Conversely, those with strong drug policies have reduced drug use and enjoy low crime rates. There is evidence that MDMA ecstasy can treat or cure post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety in cases of terminal illness.
Moreover, when the police in our city do catch an addict, they are less likely to prosecute him if he can prove that he is undergoing anything remotely resembling psychiatric treatment.
While ecstasy may have lower rates of immediate mortality than some other illicits, there is a growing science on the already recognized considerable health harms of ecstasy. So long as there is the possibility of a lucrative racket or illegal traffic, such people will find it and extend its scope.
And if it is true that the consumption of these drugs in itself predisposes to criminal behavior as data from our clinic suggestit is also possible that the effect on the rate of criminality of this rise in consumption would swamp the decrease that resulted from decriminalization.
So long as any restriction whatever regulates the consumption of drugs, many addicts will seek them illicitly, regardless of what they receive legally. Department of Justice, DEA, But just look at Liverpool, where 2, people of a population ofreceive official prescriptions for methadone: The first step in any plan to alleviate this dreadful affliction should be the establishment of Federal control and dispensation — at cost — of habit-forming drugs.
Much of this violence takes place in the home, as the relatives of crack takers will testify. The fact that the prohibition represents a genuine restriction of our freedom is of no account. They are influencing legislation and having a significant impact on the national policy debate in the United States and in other countries.
And this is despite the fact that 14 percent of the gross domestic product of the United States to say nothing of the efforts of other countries goes into the fight against death.
A black market would still exist unless all psychoactive and addictive drugs in all strengths were made available to all ages in unlimited quantity.
The tax revenue collected from alcohol pales in comparison to the costs associated with it. Thus things fall apart, and the center cannot hold. For instance, inclose to 60, prisoners 3. After so many years of drug control experience, we now know that a coherent, long-term strategy can reduce drug supply, demand and trafficking.
This argument is gaining favour, as national administrations seek new sources of revenue during the current economic crisis. An analysis of drug-induced deaths for the year period — found the vast majority attributable to accidental overdose, and suicide by drug taking, which together account for about 76 percent of all such deaths.
Nevertheless, drunkenness among them far outstripped anything I have ever seen, before or since. Simple reflection tells us that a supply invariably grows up to meet a demand; and when the demand is widespread, suppression is useless.
In fact Britain, which has had a relatively liberal approach to the prescribing of opiate drugs to addicts since I myself have prescribed heroin to addictshas seen an explosive increase in addiction to opiates and all the evils associated with it since the s, despite that liberal policy. In my clinics in prison, I see numerous prisoners who were on methadone when they committed the crime for which they are incarcerated.
It might be argued that the freedom to choose among a variety of intoxicating substances is a much more important freedom and that millions of people have derived innocent fun from taking stimulants and narcotics. It stands to reason, therefore, that all these problems would be resolved at a stroke if everyone were permitted to smoke, swallow, or inject anything he chose.
Let us then abolish medical schools, hospitals, and departments of public health. He also said that it could become a predatory body like the lobbying arms of the tobacco and alcohol industries.
The illegality of injectable drugs leads to a scarcity of needles which causes an increase in HIV infections. It may well be that the real difference is considerably less than this, because the patients have an incentive to exaggerate it to secure the continuation of their methadone.
There is literature showing that increases in the price of cigarettes triggers declines in use.Drug legalization would yield tax revenues of $ billion annually, assuming legal drugs were taxed at rates comparable to those on alcohol and tobacco, they said.
Editorial Essay: “Argument versus Section Difference Between and Argument The first argument noted in the article was that Mexico argues that the sale of marijuana “fuels the country’s vicious cartels and smugglers” (Longmire par.
1). Legalization of Drugs Introduction The issue of legalization of illegal drugs has been a heated.
Rogerian Argument for Marijuana Legalization Pros & Cons of Legalization of Marijuana Essay [tags: MArijuana, legalization, drugs] Research Papers words (3 pages) Legalisation of Marijuana Essay. We have been force-fed the notion that illegal drugs such as cocaine, LSD, and marijuana are terrible societal and mor Just Say Yes: An Argument For Drug Legalization | Teen Ink Login.
Below is a free excerpt of "Argumentative Essay On Drug Legalization" from Anti Essays, your source for free research papers, essays, and term paper examples.
In the United States, The War on Drugs is a major event that has been negatively affecting our country for many years/5(1). Legalization of Drugs Argument - Legalization of Drugs Argument Man, as a creature, is inherently bored.
Since the dawn of time, it has been the natural instinct of man to find alternative methods to enhance his being. and it is clear as to why legalizing drugs would not be a logical solution As spoken in this essay about the legalization.Download