Four thinks they can determine the truth, regardless. As the jury foreman, he is somewhat preoccupied with his duties, although helpful to accommodate others. Nine supports him against Seven because he is aware that a life is at stake, and that Eight is standing alone is courageous.
Active Themes Juror Eight replies that he wants to be heard out. He thinks that the testimony about the argument that the boy had with his father is compelling evidence. At the end of the film, he reveals to Juror 9 that his name is Davis, one of only two jurors to reveal his name; played by Henry Fonda.
The accused is a youth from a poor urban area who is on trial for killing his father with a switch knife. He or she lays out the stakes: Active Themes The Foreman then comments that he had a friend who wanted to be on the jury instead of him. He sees the kid as not deserving of sympathy for his hard life, but conversely as all the more ready to lash out because of that hard life.
However, Juror 9 reveals it was he that changed his vote, agreeing there should be some discussion. An experienced knife-fighter would not disobey this rule in a moment of peril and emotion. Later, Nine will further discuss the concepts of truths and lies.
He informs the jurors that they must find the defendant not guilty if there is a reasonable doubt that he is guilty. Jurors 3, 4 and Sidney Lumetwhose prior directorial credits included dramas for television productions such as The Alcoa Hour and Studio Onewas recruited by Henry Fonda and Rose to direct.
The Foreman continues that his friend served on a jury where they found the defendant not guilty, but later learned that he really did the murder. Is Eight being contrary for the sake of doing so? Juror Four pushes the point that the lawyers took the jurors to the el track and they were able to see what was happening on the other side.
The impossibility of these contradictions convinces everyone, except Three, Four, and Ten. He is the sixth to vote "not guilty"; played by Edward Binns.
The other jurors look at Juror Eight coldly. Seven hopes that they will already be in agreement. He is polite and makes a point of speaking with proper English grammar. He is the second to vote "not guilty". Juror Three is focused on getting the case over. A businessman and distraught father, opinionated, disrespectful and stubborn with a temper.
Ten, Four, and Five show how their backgrounds influence them to either instinctively believe or distrust the kid. He is the seventh to vote "not guilty". Juror 5 passes on giving his reasons for his guilty verdict.
Active Themes As the guard goes to get the switch knife, Juror Four leads the jury in establishing the facts surrounding the knife. Juror 3, growing more irritated throughout the process, explodes in a rant: If there is any reasonable doubt they are to return a verdict of not guilty.
A man who grew up in a violent slum, and does not take kindly to insults about his upbringing. The experiment proves the possibility but Juror 5 then steps up and demonstrates the correct way to hold and use a switchblade; revealing that anyone skilled with a switchblade, as the boy would be, would always stab underhanded at an upwards angle against an opponent who was taller than them, as the grip of stabbing downwards would be too awkward and the act of changing hands too time consuming.
Increasingly impatient, Juror 7 changes his vote to hasten the deliberation, which earns him the ire of other jurors especially 11 for voting frivolously; after being pressed by Juror 11, Juror 7 insists, unconvincingly, that he actually thinks the boy is not guilty.
Juror Three tries to calm Juror Five down, and there is a long silence. Three wonders why the old man would lie and Nine points out the quietness and poverty of the man.Twelve’s mind remains outside the situation in the jury room.
References to Twelve’s job and to the quality of Four’s suit introduce the topic of class. Ideas about income and the difficulties of living in poverty appear throughout the play, affecting the jury members views in general and of the case.
12 Angry Men Summary. 8th Juror calls into question the validity of the testimony of the old man living downstairs. 9th Juror provides the possibility that the old man was only testifying to feel important. 8th Juror concludes by saying that even if he did hear him say.
12 angry men. SHS English II Mrs. Jenkins. STUDY.
PLAY. acquittal. A discharge from accusation by judicial action. The author of the play "Twelve Angry Men" juror. What reason for changing his vote does juror 9 give at the open of act 2? At the beginning of "Twelve Angry Men", progressive look at the cast is important for the final outcome of the play as one juror after another changes their mind about the verdict.
Juror #8. He does not change his vote until a witness’s testimony is discredited (due to the witness’s apparently poor vision). Find out what happens in Scene 1 of 12 Angry Men. Get a detailed summary of the the action.
Skip to navigation ; Skip to content 12 Angry Men Scene 1 Summary. BACK; The judge explains to the twelve male jurors their responsibilities in voting on the fate of a man accused of murder. Overall, the judge seems pretty bored with the whole.
The American jury system is evaluated in the drama Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose. After six days of testimony, the play begins with the judge giving the jurors their instructions for.Download